Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Carole Bouchard's avatar

The comps thing always feels so overblown to me... A symptom of how, in some genres (romantasy is turning into a tedious curse for example), we're actually seeing the same book over and over again... Same but not so different. If it's just like this book with a bit of that book, surely it'll sell... Like "please tell me your book is just like this other one...". And so some writers start writing with this in mind.

I've reached the point where I'd prefer to know what other books your book is not and why you can't find a proper comp title lol I get the marketing tool that comps are, but when I'm starting reading some writers spending ages and so much of their nerves on finding great comps, I take it as a sign it's gone too far.

Expand full comment
Xuan Ba Nguyen's avatar

This is such a thoughtful and generous roundup—thank you. I’ve been deep in the query trenches with my speculative literary thriller (Many Earths) and this resonates on so many levels. Sharpening my query with tighter comps, clearer stakes, and a stronger emotional throughline really changed the response. I landed a full request shortly after a major rewrite—proof that the work pays off.

The note about “convoluted plot summaries” hit home. It took multiple revisions to strip mine down to what truly mattered. Also co-signing the value of Publishers Marketplace—it’s helped me see how editors frame genre blends and where my book fits in that landscape. (I’ve got a foot in grounded sci-fi and family mystery, and comps behave differently depending on emphasis.)

Really appreciate how you break this down. Posts like this help clarify the moving target that is publishing.

Expand full comment
34 more comments...

No posts